Preimplantation Genetic
Diagnosis (PGD)
by Michael Feinman, M.D.
Huntington Reproductive Center
301 South Fair Oaks Avenue
Suites 402 and 405
Pacedena, CA 91105
(626) 440-9161
Since the birth of
the first baby conceived through IVF, doctors,
scientists, patients, and ethicists have
realized with a mixture of excitement and dread
that combining the emerging technologies of
in-vitro fertilization and genetics could allow
for the screening of genetic traits prior to
conception. Over the past few years, this dream
has become a reality through Preimplantation
Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). With PGD, many genetic
and chromosomal abnormalities can be detected
prior to conception. This article will describe
the different methods of PGD, who might benefit
from this new technology, and will consider some
of the ethical issues raised by this exciting
development.
In general,
three types of conditions can be detected
through PGD. Looking for abnormal numbers of
chromosomes, or aneuploidy, is the first. The
second type of PGD looks for single gene
disorders, such as cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs
disease, and sickle cell anemia. Finally,
balanced translocations can be detected through
PGD. A person who carries a balanced
translocation has the correct number of
chromosomes, but two of the chromosomes have
exchanged pieces. A translocation carrier’s
offspring are at increased risk for chromosomal
abnormalities, such as Down Syndrome. In
addition, balanced translocations are
responsible for approximately 3-5% of repeat
miscarriages.
To understand
how PGD works, we need to describe some aspects
of the fertilization and subsequent early embryo
development. The process that results in sperm
and eggs containing 23 chromosomes is called
meiosis. In their resting state, eggs exist in a
state of arrested meiosis, and still contain all
46 chromosomes. During ovulation, meiosis
resumes, and the egg extrudes one copy of its 46
chromosomes in a small structure called the
polar body. Soon after fertilization occurs, a
second polar body, containing 23 maternal
chromosomes, is expelled. On the day following
an egg retrieval, these two polar bodies can be
seen in the normally fertilized egg under the
microscope.
Aneuploidy
studies begin with polar body biopsies. On the
day following egg retrieval, after normal
fertilization has been detected, the two polar
bodies are removed from the fertilized egg,
without invading the cell itself, or harming the
nuclei. Special stains, or probes, are applied
to the biopsy material that attach to
chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, and 22. These
chromosomes were selected because they account
for the vast majority of aneuploidies. Since the
test relies on visualizing little colored spots
under the microscope, it is not possible to
study every chromosome. Rare abnormalities
involving other chromosomes can be missed, but
fortunately, these embryos almost never progress
to the fetal stage. Since polar body biopsies
only evaluate the genetic material from the egg,
the sex of the embryo cannot be determined from
this procedure. Also, aneuploidy resulting from
a chromosomally abnormal sperm cannot be
detected by analyzing the polar bodies. However,
in about 80-90% of chromosomally abnormal
embryos, the extra or missing chromosome came
from the egg. Sometimes, for technical reasons,
the polar body biopsy does not provide clear
information regarding aneuploidy, and a
blastomere biopsy may be performed to clarify
the results.
Sex
determination requires a blastomere biopsy. This
slightly more invasive procedure requires
removal of one or two of the early embryonic
cells at the 6-8 cell stage, on day 3 after the
egg retrieval. To identify the sex of the
embryo, such as when needed to test for X-linked
genetic disorders, probes for chromosomes 13,
18, 21, X and Y are applied to the cell(s).
The second type
of PGD seeks out single gene disorders.
Different expressions of a single gene are known
as alleles. A large library of genetic probes
has been created that can specifically identify
different alleles at specific gene sites that
cause many genetic disorders. In some
conditions, there are many different possible
mutations of the gene, and specific probes for
each patient are created.
With recessive
traits, like cystic fibrosis, for a couple that
has had a previous child with the disorder, each
parent possesses a normal and an abnormal
allele. When these two people reproduce, on
average 50% of their embryos will carry one copy
of the abnormal allele and 25% will carry two
copies of the abnormal allele and will be
affected by the disease. For dominant traits,
one copy of the abnormal allele is sufficient to
cause the disease. In most cases, people who
have one abnormal dominant allele have the
condition in question. Therefore, each of their
offspring has a 50% chance to inherit the gene,
and thus the disease.
In theory,
blastomere biopsies are superior to polar body
biopsies, because they allow identification of
both maternal and paternal genes. This allows
differentiation of normal, carrier, and disease
states. This approach uses the technology of
polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA strands
are cut into smaller pieces by enzymes, and
millions of copies of the DNA are produced by
the PCR. The strands of DNA are allowed to come
back together, and abnormal genes cause the
strands to align differently, thus allowing the
identification of the abnormal gene.
Unfortunately,
because of a technical problem, known as allele
dropout (ADO), an abnormal allele can be hidden
or not detectable by the testing, so that an
embryo with a genetic abnormality could appear
to be unaffected. To minimize the interference
of ADO, if both parents have the same gene
mutation, polar body biopsy is done first.
Depending on how many copies of the abnormal
allele are present in the polar bodies, we can
determine whether the egg carries the normal
allele or the abnormal allele. All eggs that
carry the abnormal allele are eliminated.
Because polar body biopsy only analyzes the
maternal contribution of the DNA, this technique
cannot determine whether the resulting embryo
would be normal or a carrier of the disease.
Therefore, blastomere biopsy may need to be
performed as a second step. To further reduce
the problems associated with ADO, and increase
the accuracy of DNA tests, linked markers are
also utilized. Linked markers are segments of
DNA that lie very close to the gene being
studied. By testing the linked markers, as well
as the gene in question, we can confirm the
results of the genetic testing and determine
whether ADO has occurred.
The third group
of patients who can benefit from PGD are those
with balanced translocations. Carriers of
balanced translocations are healthy individuals,
but have high miscarriage rates and are at
increased risk for having children with
unbalanced chromosome translocations, which
result in an extra amount of one chromosome and
a missing piece of another chromosome. Probes
can be developed to detect these unusual
chromosomal abnormalities, and can be used on
cells taken from a blastomere biopsy. This
procedure would greatly reduce the risk of
having a child with a severe chromosomal
problem, resulting from the translocation, and
would also greatly reduce the miscarriage rate.
To date, there
are only a few hundred babies that have been
born after performing PGD. At one of the world’s
largest centers, Reproductive Genetics Institute
(RGI) in Chicago, the overall pregnancy rate
following PGD for single gene disease is about
20%. This is somewhat lower than expected, since
most of these patients were not infertile to
begin with. Hopefully, as the technology
advances and the opportunity to help more
couples rises, we will see an increase in these
success rates. The pregnancy rate following PGD
for aneuploidy is about 26%. At Huntington
Reproductive Center (HRC), we have developed an
efficient system to allow us to send embryo
biopsy material to RGI for analysis. We have
been working with RGI in this manner for about
one year.
Many ethical
questions surround PGD. Some people see the
beginning of eugenics – the striving towards
some hypothetical genetic perfection, along with
intolerance of those who are less than perfect.
At the present time, we are far away from this.
As discussed above, there are definite limits to
what can be tested for in the embryo. As the
technology advances, the medical community, and
society at large, will need to define the
boundaries of how PGD should be used. If it
becomes possible, do we want parents to be able
to select for traits like eye color and height?
Since it is already possible to select for sex,
should couples be allowed to do this when a
sex-linked genetic disorder is not involved? If
the couple needs to undergo IVF for infertility,
should they be denied this option?
Another concern
expressed towards genetic medicine is that by
attempting to eliminate individuals with genetic
conditions, we could create a society intolerant
of people with congenital disorders. If there
exists a method to prevent these individuals
from being conceived would society discriminate
against parents for choosing to allow conception
and delivery of these babies? Clearly, this
potential problem has existed for over two
decades because parents have the choice of
terminating pregnancies due to chromosomal or
genetic problems that are discovered with
amniocentesis. For the most part, society has
integrated this technology without stigmatizing
parents or their children for being born with an
inherited disease. There is no reason to believe
that society will expect couples to undergo PGD,
unless the couple desires it.
Finally, there
is the omnipresent issue of cost. PGD adds
$3,000 - $5,000 to an IVF cycle. Adding in the
costs of medications and IVF, this becomes an
expensive way to prevent genetic disease.
However, to the couple who has a child with a
severe problem, and cannot face the choice of
pregnancy termination, this procedure is
invaluable. These costs may be offset by the
enormous cost to parents and society of caring
for these often very sick children.
The marriage of
IVF and genetics was inevitable. Much work needs
to be done to make PGD a more comprehensive and
available alternative. Society must watch the
development of this technology and help define
its value and determine reasonable boundaries,
before the technology becomes more
sophisticated. Despite these challenges, PGD is
an exciting development that takes IVF beyond
its already worthy goal of creating families, by
impacting on public health through the
prevention of severe diseases, before they
occur. |